by
DonKofAK
Oct 30, 2010
1,) It's inconsistent for Gore to leave a car running; you rely on an anonymous blogger of dubious credibility, accepting his assertions as gospel, right? Why? Wouldn't Gore want to appear to be consistent because he'd be more effective if he were seen as being consistent. Makes no sense to do otherwise. I don't think he's that careless, incapable, or neglectful.
2.) In debate and argument, ad hominem attacks focus on belittling the person, not his ideas. Propagandists use ad hominem attacks; Hitler was a master at ad hominem attacks. They enabled him to do what he did. Do you like that style? I don't.